<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1955936548054264&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

Right or Effective


For all intents and purposes, the party was his to lead. He was the better known and more experienced statesman. William Seward, extraordinarily confident in his own thinking, was the expected front runner of the Republican Party in 1860. He was sharp, assertive, had clear ideas of what he wanted and made sure people knew it. So when the less known, goofy looking, humble Abraham Lincoln won the support of the party and ultimately the Presidency, Seward was left bitter and confused. I'm smarter, more experienced and more capable than this guy. Now he wants ME to work for HIM?

 

Seward knew he was smart, and made people know it too. Lincoln knew he was smart, and helped people realize that they were too and that their ideas mattered…. even if they were different than his own. Seward built arguments; Lincoln built teams. Seward was right; Lincoln was confidently curious. Seward had a temper; Lincoln had patience with a backbone.  

 

To his credit, as Secretary of State, Seward became one of Lincoln's closest advisors and friends because Lincoln made room for his faults and ideas. He demonstrated true servant leadership, drawing even his rivals close. He honored people and listened to them, which made them feel seen, heard and part of the solution.

"'...My power works best in weakness.' So now I am glad to boast about my weaknesses, so that the power of Christ can work through me." (2 Corinthians 12:9) 

The word for weakness Paul uses from the original Greek text is "astheneia" and refers to his human limitations and vulnerability: being unable to carry everything in his own strength. Paul knew that he needed Christ to carry him through the hardships, insults and troubles he was facing. In accepting his own limitations and inviting God in, he transformed from independently weak to collectively strong.

 

I see examples of this all the time in my daily experience. Two people, equally intelligent, capable thinkers and experts at what they do. One knows it and constantly tunes other people out because they have the answer in their head and that's the direction they are going to push people to go. The other a sponge of curiosity and a tremendous listener. Knowing when to insert their ideas and draw people forward. One a leader by position, the other a leader by influence. One builds followers and gets to grow, the other builds dissension and will struggle. I’ve been both of these people and know all too well their reality.

 

If you spend your life being right, you should get used to spending it alone. Lincoln and Paul both knew how capable they were. They also knew that to have real influence they needed to check their ego at the door, submissively borrow the strength of Christ, and brings others along with them.

 

Are right or are you effective?

 

 

 

 


< View All Posts